Split skin graft for diabetic ulcers: an analysis
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Tissue engineered skin for diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis.
To evaluate the effectiveness of tissue engineered skin in the management of diabetic foot ulcer. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and ISI Web of Science database in order to obtain the randomized controlled trial with interventions of tissue engineered skin. A meta-analysis was used to compare the effectiveness between tissue engineered skin and conventional treatment in the patients with diabetic f...
متن کاملDressings for split thickness skin graft donor sites.
Background: The management of donor sites after harvesting of split thickness skin grafts is a challenge. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare three different dressings for split thickness skin donor sites. Methods: This study was designed as a prospective comparative study of 60 patients allocated to one of three donor site dressings groups, following harvesting of split skin. The first a...
متن کاملImproved Healing of Split Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites
Cosmetically unacceptable pigmentation changes and hypertrophic scarring often complicate split thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites. In fact, patients often ask about other alternatives when confronted with the need to harvest STSG, particularly because they fear additional disfigurement. Because recent evidence suggests that a moist environment promotes more optimal healing, we conducted a...
متن کاملSkin replacement therapies for diabetic foot ulcers: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Diabetic ulcers complications are a leading cause of hospitalization and amputation. Ten to 15% of the 20 million individuals with diabetes are at risk of developing diabetic ulcers. Standard therapy involves the use of dressings to protect the wound bed from trauma and to absorb exsudate, offloading of high pressure on the wound bed e.g. by prescribing protective footwear, and wound bed prepar...
متن کاملSplit Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites: Post Harvest Management
All studies were categorised according to the strength of the evidence based on the following revised classification system. Level I Evidence obtained from a systematic review of all relevant randomised controlled trials. Level II Evidence obtained from at least one properly designed randomised controlled trial. Level III.1 Evidence obtained from well designed pseudo-randomised controlled trial...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Surgery Journal
سال: 2016
ISSN: 2349-3305
DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20163592